Masochism: Gilles Deleuze, Coldness and cruelty and Leo- pold von Sacher- Masoch, Venus in furs. Tr. Jean McNeil. New York: Zone Books, Pp. May 27, Accordingly Deleuze analyzes and psychoanalyzes Sacher-Masoch’s novel, Venus in Furs, which appears in a new translation as the second. In the context of their discussion of critics’ exploration of the homosexual elements of A la recherche du temps perdu in their Anti-Oedipus, Gilles Deleuze and.
|Published (Last):||12 February 2015|
|PDF File Size:||17.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Thinking about contracts to cover what is about to happen can be devilish. And then after is an even worse chapter on the Freudian implications 57 ff. Print Hardcover and Paperback. If you like sappy romance stories, buy something else. Deleuze’s essay, certainly the most profound colddness yet produced on the relations between sadism and masochism, seeks to develop and explain Masoch’s “peculiar way of ‘desexualizing’ love while at the same time sexualizing the entire history of humanity.
In the Foreword Deleuze states that Masoch has a adn way of “desexualising love while at the same time sexualizing the entire history of humanity”. Lists with This Book. Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Deleuze makes that contrast a part of his understanding of the difference between actual masochism and sadism.
Read reviews that mention venus in furs deleuze coldjess masochism text freud literature sade. Refresh and try again.
I enjoy Deleuze’s crueoty approach to Freud and Masoch, though I do think that his analysis is not a replacement for case studies. Coldness and Cruelty Cover of the first edition. Read Deleuze’s section on Coldness and Cruelty, which outlines the conditions for masochism and is an absolute gem. He wrote on Spinoza, Nietzche, Kant, Leibniz and others, including literary authors deleue works, cinema, and art. He argues like one of the ancient Green rhetoricians who had to prove their skill by defending an obviously indefensible position, i.
Notably, within his metaphysics he favored a Spinozian concept of a plane of immanence with everything a mode of one substance, and thus on the same level of existence. Paperbackpages. His argumentation is brilliant as practically always – I admit that I love his worksbut the essay itself is completely misleading. Unlike Tartt quoting it optimistically the words actually come from a Nietzsche entry labeled Pessimism in Art. Therefore, despite the excellent reasoning in the text, Deleuze arrives into completely ridiculous conclusions that contradict the reality of the phenomenon.
This is achieved by inducing the hetaeric mother anv betray and provoking the Oedipal mother to punish.
Follow the Author
Bachofen is mentioned as an expert in three forms of primeval matriarchy. Sep 15, Islam Khatib added it.
I do not have the prerequisite knowledge of philosophy and psychoanalysis to really understand most of what he’s arguing here. The novel is more of a lugubr I confess a preexisting lukewarmness toward Deleuze stemming from a battle with “Bergsonism” years ago: It is unrealistic because a genuine sadist could never tolerate a masochistic victim.
In his stunning essay, Coldness and Cruelty, Gilles Deleuze provides a rigorous and informed philosophical examination of the work of the late 19th-century German novelist Leopold von Sacher-Masoch. All and all killer text, though, and a great edition to boot. Gilles Deleuze began his career with a number of idiosyncratic yet rigorous historical studies of figures outside of the Continental tradition in vogue at the time.
Although the entire constellation of symbols that has come to characterize the masochistic syndrome can be found here – fetishes, whips, disguises, fur-clad women, contracts, humiliations, punishment, and always the volatile presence of a terrible coldness – these do not eclipse the singular power of Masoch’s eroticism.
However, I highly enjoyed Sacher-Masoch’s prose. Enjoyable to see someone dissect Masochism as a totally separate impulse completely from Sadism, rather than just it’s opposite or complement, since I totally agree.
Deleuze succeeds in showing that sadism and masochism are not symmetrical concepts that can be found in the same person, but are very specific concepts that exist in entirely different worlds. It does draw out a contrast: In terms of clinical analysis of sadism and masochism, I still prefer Lacan, but this is a great critical contribution.
MASOCHISM: An Interpretation of Coldness & Cruelty by Gilles Deleuze | Kirkus Reviews
Deleuze buys into a lot of Freud’s notions about gendered family structure. Both have political implications. It is the quest for the oral mother through the hetaeric and Oedipal mothers.
Feb 24, Lily Simonson rated it really liked it. No trivia or quizzes yet. See 1 question about Masochism…. It looks like ole Gilles is having some fun at the expense of the Left.
The best extended work on the subject that I have read, full of philosophical and literary allusions. It is no longer a matter of pain and sexual pleasure only but of bondage and humiliation as well. I’m not completely familiar with Deleuze’s thoughts. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? A second and third type of women also get mentioned by Deleuze as stages in Bachofen’s theory of how people were converted to patriarchal hierarchies.
This is a bipartite work by a professor at the University of Paris designed primarily to show that sado-masochism is a portmanteau term, that masochism has been considered only as an adjunct to sadism and that, accordingly, Leopold yon Sacher-Masoch has been totally neglected.