“Disability Theory is just the book we’ve been waiting for. Clear Tobin Siebers persuasively argues that disability studies transfigures basic. Disability Theory, Tobin Siebers (Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, pages). Reviewed by Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson, Miami University of Ohio. Tobin Siebers’. “Disability Theoryis just the book we’ve been waiting for. Tobin Siebers in some of the major debates of the last thirty years in critical and cultural theory.
|Published (Last):||11 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||19.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Siebers adapts their views to show theorh yes, disability exists as a set of social constructions but once that reality is made it takes on a “shape, politics, and history that belongs to the realm of human action” Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
Passionate, respectful debate is always welcome.
He is highly critical of adapting the identitarian position that reduces all persons with disabilities to a single class, but he also feels that without some sense of collective identity, claiming rights under federal and state gobin will be difficult. Underpinning all of these issues are two basic questions: University of Michigan Press, A History of Disability. If you want your comment published, focus on speaking to the issue at hand.
Changing the Conversation Autism and Empathy: Siebers addresses the questions of how disability theory and other forms of critical theory can challenge and inform one another, how disability theory can move past the poststructuralist position that all experience is simply a linguistic construct and give voice to the embodied experience of disability, and how identity politics can move the disability rights movement dsability in its struggle for universal access.
The dossier represents, as he says, “a deliberate act of identity politics, and I offer no apology for it because identity politics remains in my view the most practical course of action by which to address social injustices against minority peoples.
Tobin Siebers, Disability Theory | Davidson | Disability Studies Quarterly
It is targeted toward readers already well versed in disability studies and critical theory, and its complex discussions of very particular aspects of disability experience operate at the highest theoretical levels. Intelligent, provocative, and challenging, Disability Theory revolutionizes the terrain of theory by providing indisputable evidence of the value and sieebrs that a disability studies perspective can bring to key critical and cultural questions.
One of the most important things about toin book is its discussion of the relations between sexuality and disability. This paradigm, Siebers believes, must make way for a new framework that stresses interdependence, because even those who possess at least temporarily what our culture considers normative disabilit have a mutual dependence upon one another Siebers Discourses Of Disability Corporealities: His discussion of disability “sexual culture” will broaden our knowledge of these matters.
And that’s all to the good. This is the thrust of chapter six in particular, but it informs much of the writing in this book.
This counter-argument owes a good deal to the work of Paula Moya and Satya Mohanty whose theories of realism provide an important framework for negotiating between social constructionist claims and lived reality. Intelligent, provocative, and challenging, Disability Theory revolutionizes the terrain of theory by providing indisputable evidence of the value and utility that a disability studies perspective can bring to key critical and cultural questions.
The ever-present fact of the fragility of human life is one that our culture turns from in its zeal to celebrate strength, youth, and able-bodiedness. It is the hyperindividualization of disability, Siebers believes, that makes disabled people so vulnerable — physically, socially, and politically. Narcissism, much like the autism, becomes an expression of a pathologized individualism. If a constituency is perceived to define rights claims for “special accommodation” around individual medical conditions, then that group could be said to be self-serving and narcissistic — hardly the best climate in which to mount a social movement.
It is a complicated commentary on the category of mimesis with the artist drawing the body society desires on the disabled body society refuses to see, using the cosmetic tool that distinguishes, as we have heard recently, soccer moms from pit bulls.
Moreover, a disability identity is not about embracing suffering, but about understanding, analyzing, and critiquing the social structures that cause it Siebers Once we represent disability as a common human experience, it becomes much more difficult to justify withholding rights because of physical thepry. Nimble six-footers, with an intuitive sense of dark spaces, acute hearing, and a love of staircases do. How do we overturn the medicalized representation of disability disabikity portrays impairment as a purely individual matter of physical functioning?
This position offers Siebers a chance to attend to complex embodiment in specific cases Deaf persons differ fundamentally from people in wheelchairs in their attitudes about disability; people with chronic illness differ from people with spinal injuries, hheory. In sum, people in wheelchairs, people with diminished sight and hearing, those with difficulty climbing stairs, people uncomfortable reaching high disabilityy bending low, and those unable to grasp objects do not fit easily in my house.
Beginning with Volume 36, Issue No. Disability Theory Tobin Siebers Limited preview – As Siebers puts it so eloquently:. As a professor specializing in disability studies in the departments didability Arts and Design and English Language and Literature at the University of Michigan, Siebers concerns himself, first and foremost, with the question of why disabled people are oppressed in our culture.
Some bodies are included, and others excluded — not by nature, but by design. What difference to human rights would it make if we were to treat fragility, vulnerability, and disability as central to the human condition, if we were to see disability theoyr a positive, critical concept useful to define the shared need among all people for the protection of human rights?
Some readers may feel that the sudden eruption of a dossier in the midst of a theoretical discussion is distracting, but I feel that they actually offer a public counter-theme to the theory that suggests the importance of grounding theory in concrete disabiltiy.
It is a good example of Siebers’ “realist” position in action. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. The strength of social constructionism lies in its dual understanding that we cannot view bodies outside of culture, and that this insight, in and of itself, is liberating. For me, one of the most powerful aspects of the concept of the social body is that it makes all bodies visible. Our lives depend upon such interdependence.
He notes that in Foucault’s distinction between the pre-modern soldier and the modern “docile” soldier, there lies an ableist ideology that prefers the former as a default. I’m a Disabled Person Identity and Hypocrisy: I reserve the right to edit or delete any comments that violate this policy, without explanation or apology.
Welcome to my tobih