Lyotard’s libidinal philosophy is developed in the major work Libidinal Economy and in two sets of essays, Dérive à partir. Peter King reviews Libidinal Economy by Jean-Francois Lyotard. Desire stands for emancipation, but it is also permeated by the libidinal economy. What does this mean? Jean-François Lyotard’s research on libidinal economy.
|Published (Last):||20 August 2007|
|PDF File Size:||3.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Situation takes place when the instances of the phrase universe are fixed through the concatenation of phrases. Lyotard’s libidinal politics is not aimed at overthrowing capitalism, then, but of working within it to release the libidinal energies dissimulated within its structures.
However this only reinforces the premise that this is a book belonging to a fairly specific period and again begs the question as to why it has now appeared in translation.
He sees the performativity criterion as applying not just to science, technology, and capital, but libidinl the State as well. Lyotard describes the bar as then turning around on itself and creating an enclosed space, a theatrical volume. The Postmodern Condition is a study of the status of knowledge in computerized societies.
Lyotard seeks to dethrone the subject from this organisational role, which in effect means decentring it as a philosophical category. It is essential to distinguish Lyotard’s concept of postmodern art from other ideas of postmodern art.
The law of concatenation states that these linkages must be made – that is, a phrase must be followed eonomy another phrase – but that how to link is never determinate.
Semiotext e Robert Harvey and Mark S. The addressor does not believe that the referent the wrong, etc. Necessity can be realized in the domain of reality, not counter to it, as Piaget claims.
Postmodernist Porn | Issue 8 | Philosophy Now
The philosopher Douglas Kellner writes that, like Deleuze and Guattari ‘s Anti-OedipusLibidinal Economy is a key text in the micropolitics of desire. If the entire project of science needs a metalegitimation, however and the criteria for scientific knowledge would itself seem to demand that it does then science has no recourse but to narrative knowledge which according to scientific criteria is no knowledge at all.
His aim is to show that structuralism ignores the figural elements at work both outside and within representational structures. The productive force of the unconscious is divorced from personal pleasure, but still resides in the realm of desire and its libidinality. Vygotsky insists that the attachment or detachment libidjnal a child to the implementation of social procedures is dependent on the social conditions of his economj her upbringing—on whether the child is raised in the family or in broader collectivities.
Lyotard came to Algeria at a libidinzl time: And just as in capitalism, where it matters not what goods are in circulation as long as there is an accumulation of capital, desires are neutral as to their locale. He pays close attention to the economic forces at work in occupied Algeria, arguing that it is in the economic interests of France to keep Algerians in a state of underdevelopment and poverty.
In this way, the postmodern artist is modernist in the sense of seeking out what is new, not according to pre-established phrase regimens, but by exploring means for finding what cannot be articulated within any phrase regimens.
Jean-François Lyotard (1924—1998)
In other words, Freudian interpretation and many other interpretations that follow Freud presents the libido as a negative drive that results from the fact that genital intercourse is not necessarily econoy to stand for libidial or libidinality.
By contrast, the society in which production was by definition based on alienated labor and social relations generated commodities that aroused intimacy, desire, and comfort—i. Intensive “exchanges” are ignorant of the constitutive negation of both political economy and natural theology since the libido invests unconditionally.
Despite its popularity, however, this book is in fact one of his more minor works. Lyotard takes Barnett Newman’s work as a paragon of postmodern, avant-garde libidinnal.
The future, as such, is not something that can be predicted from the present, since this would only be a present imagined into the future. The distinction between narrative and scientific knowledge is a crucial point in Lyotard’s theory of postmodernism, and one of the defining features of postmodernity, on his account, is the dominance of scientific knowledge over narrative knowledge.
Considering the book has its own glossary for the terminology used to breakdown the human condition, it’s more of a puzzle to put together. Lyotard proposes that a better form of legitimation would be legitimation by paralogy. In the case of a differend, a wrong is done to a party who cannot phrase their hurt See Postmodernism c The Differend.
In the form of a question? Allen Severino rated it really liked it Jul libidimal, A silent phrase in the context of a dispute may be covering four possible states of affairs, corresponding to each of the instances in the phrase universe: